THE EFFECT OF USING THE PQ4R (PREVIEW, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, REVIEW) STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this Research Project is to find out the effectiveness of of PQ4R strategy in students’ reading comprehension. The research hypothesis is the use PQ4R strategy gives positive effect toward students' ability in reading recount text. PQ4R strategy is applied to the eighth-grade students of SMP N 3 Brebes in the Academic Year 2021/2022. In this research, the population is all of eighth grade students in SMP N 3 Brebes, which is totally 310 students. The writer uses cluster random sampling with two group design (experiment group and control group). The total of sample is 50 students, 25 students is as experiment group and 25 students is as control group. For the instrument, the researcher used reading test in form of multiple choice. There are 40 items of multiple choice for pre-test and post-test. The results of the t test found a significant difference between the post-test experimental group of 78.92 out performing the control group of 64.64. It is known that Sig. (2-tailed) is 0.000 lower <0.05 According to result of data, hypothesis t-test is rejected, and hypothesis t-table is accepted. It means the PQ4R strategy gives positive effect toward students' reading comprehension at the second-grade students of SMP N 3 Brebes in the academic year of 2021/2022. Then, the researcher suggest for the English teachers to use this strategy in teaching reading in junior High School
Article Details
References
[2] Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the Traps: Seeking Good Practice in the Use of Self-Assessment and Reflection in Professional Courses. Social Work Education, 18, 121–132. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479911220131
[3] Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New ork: Addison Wesley Longman.
[4] Brown, H. D. (2017). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Logman.
[5] Butcher, C., Clara Davies, & Melissa Highton. (2006). Designing Learning: From Module Outline to Effective Teaching. Routledge. https://doi.org/DOI:10.4324/9780203968482
[6] Christopher M. Gunn, & Alok Johri. (2011). News and knowledge capital. 14(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2010.07.003
[7] Daniel Muijs, & David Reynolds. (2002). Teachers’ Beliefs and Behaviors: What Really Matters? The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 3(15), 13.
[8] David Reynolds, Pam Sammons, Bieke De Fraine, & Jan Van Damme. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2). https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
[9] Ference Marton, & Ming Fai Pang. (2006). On Some Necessary Conditions of Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
[10] Harmer. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching4 th Ed.). London: Longman.
[11] Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How Classroom Teachers Can Help Students Learn and Teach Them How to Learn. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3
[12] Michael Reynolds, & Russ Vince. (2004). Critical Management Education and Action-Based Learning: Synergies and Contradictions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(4), 442–456.
[13] Pawe? Sobkowiak. (2015). Developing Students’ Intercultural Competence in Foreign Language Textbooks. https://doi.org/DOI:10.17265/2161-6248/2015.12.003
[14] Ryan, Cooper, & Tauer. (2013). ??No Title No Title No Title. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents.
[15] Slavin, R. (2010). Cooperative learning: a theory, research and practice. London: Allya Bacon.
[16] Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49–62.
[17] Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R and D. In Bandung: Alfabeta (Vol. 3, Issue April).