Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 15, 2022
Published
Apr 17, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 69 Download : 76

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pengetahuan yang baik tentang integrasi Sains, Teknologi, Teknik, dan Matematika (STEM) sangat penting bagi calon guru matematika sebelum mereka menerapkan pembelajaran matematika yang sukses menggunakan model pembelajaran STEM. Makalah ini melaporkan tentang persepsi calon guru matematika dalam mengintegrasikan STEM pada pembelajaran matematika di sekolah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang melibatkan 50 orang calon guru matematika di Solo sebagai sampel penelitian. Persepsi calon guru matematika tentang model pembelajaran STEM diungkap melalui 10 butir pertanyaan dalam wawancara mendalam dan sepuluh item terbuka dalam questioner.  Persepsi calon guru matematika terhadap STEM ini dianalisis dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif menggunakan analisis isi dengan interpretative coding. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa calon guru matematika telah memahami konsep dasar STEM namun masih perlu ditingkatkan. Sebagian besar calon guru matematika telah mengetahui definisi dan posisi STEM. Namun, mereka masih memiliki pengetahuan yang kurang tentang contoh penerapan STEM dalam pelajaran matematika. Oleh karena itu, calon guru matematika perlu mengikuti pelatihan, seminar dan workshop yang memberikan panduan tentang bagaimana menerapkan pendekatan STEM khususnya dalam pembelajaran matematika. Melalui kegiatan penelitian ini, para calon guru matematika dapat mengembangkan keterampilan mereka dalam mempersiapkan pembelajaran STEM yang terlihat pada kesiapan mereka dalam mengintegrasikan STEM pada kegiatan pembelajaran matematika.

Keywords

Persepsi Guru Matematika STEM

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Altan, & Ercan. (2016). STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13 103-117.DOI:https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10174a
  2. Asghar, Ellington, Rice, Johnson, & Prime. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts Interdisciplinary. Journal of Problem-Based Learning 6(2) 85-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
  3. Aydin-Gunbatar, Tarkin-Celikkiran, E. Kutucu, & Ekiz-Kiran. (2018). The influence of a design-based STEM education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 19(3) 954-972. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00128f
  4. Basha. (2018). Investigating teachers’ perceptions and implementation of STEM education in the United Arab Emirate. [Dissertation]. UAE, The British University in Dubai.
  5. Bullock. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies 53(6) 628–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369082
  6. Breiner, Harkness, Johnson, & Koehler. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of stem in education and partnerships, School Science and Mathematics 112(1) 3–11.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  7. Devi, Karyana, & Nulhakim. (2018). Elektrokimia:electroplating/pelapisan logam, South East Asia Ministry of Education Organization (SEAMEO QIETP) In Science.
  8. Du, Liu, Johnson, Sondergeld, Bolshakova, & Moore. (2019). The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics 119(2) 105–114.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318
  9. Fitriyana, Wiyarsi, & Sugiyarto. (2018). The profile of students’ self-efficacy on hydrocarbon hybrid learning and android-basedgame. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications 9(2) 1-15
  10. Holbrook, & Rannikmae. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education 29(11) 1347-1362.
  11. Kennedy. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International 25(3) 246-258.
  12. Mardiyah. (2019). Persepsi guru kimia ma setangerang selatan tentang pendekatan STEM. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
  13. Margot, & Kettle. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature reciew. Int J STEM Educ 6(2) 1-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
  14. Nugroho, Permanasari, & Firman. (2019). The movement of STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 8(3) 417425.DOI:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19252
  15. Psycharis. (2016). The impact of computational experiment and formative assessment in inquirybased learning approach in STEM education. Journal of Science Education & Technology 25 316-326.
  16. Roberts, Jackson, Mohr-Schroeder, Bush, Maiorca, Cavalcanti, Schroeder, Delaney, Putnam, & Cremeans. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education 5 35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4.
  17. Scaramozzino. (2010). Integrating STEM information competencies into an undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Library Administration. 50(4) 315–333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01930821003666981
  18. Sheffield, Koul, Blackley, Fitriani, Rahmawati, & Resek. (2018). Transnational examination of STEM education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 26(8) 67–80
  19. Stohlmann. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM Education. Journal of PreCollege Engineering Education Research (JPEER) 2(1) 28-34.DOI:https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
  20. Subagia. (2014). Paradigma baru pembelajaran kimia SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA IV 4 152-163.
  21. Tan. (2018). Why STEM? Why now? Educating for technologies, or technologies for education? Learning: Research and Practice 4(2) 203-209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2018.1511275
  22. Toma, & Greca. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech 14(4) (2018) 1383–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
  23. Wibawa, & Kardipah. (2018). The flipped-blended model for STEM education to improve students’ performances. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(2) 2-29. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14298
  24. Wiyarsi, Pratomo, & Priyambodo. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: a case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education 17(1) 147161.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18.