Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 72 Download : 95

Main Article Content

Abstract

An abstract should be explained well so that the readers will understand the content of the writing. Therefore, it is important to know the relationship between the meaning of words when writing an abstract. This study aimed to describe and analyze the sense relation of thesis abstracts that were written by English Language Education Study Program students FKIP Lambung Mangkurat University batch 2017 who graduated in 2021. The method of the research is descriptive qualitative and the subject was the students of ELESP.  The researcher has carried out reading and note-taking techniques for data. The findings of the study show that there were seven types of sense relation found the in thesis abstract that was written by ELESP. There are 61 synonyms, 22 hyponyms, 25 homonyms, 39 polysemy, 16 complementarities grade abilities, and 10 relational opposites and there are additional words -s, -ed, found in some words. From the results of the study, it can be suggested that (1) the students of ELESP should understand more about the material of sense relation so that they can easily write their academic papers including thesis abstract, (2) the lecturers should explain more to the students on the importance of using the correct sense relation in writing the abstracts, (3) it is expected that other researchers focus more on the sense relation element in their further research.

Keywords

Abstract Writing Sense Relation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Au, W. W. (2017). Highlights for Improvement of Scientific Writing for Publication in High Impact Journals. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 3(3), 97.
  2. Faidah, Y. (2018). Overview Of Language Learning In Sense Relation: Sameness And Oppositeness. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 6(2).
  3. Ferdiana, S. (2013). The Analysis of Sense Relations Found in English Translation of Sura Yusuf (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muria Kudus).
  4. Hanafiah, R., & Lubis, M. (2020). An Analysis of Lexical And Syntactical Errors In The English Paper Abstracts of The Accounting Department Students of POLMED.
  5. Hidayati, N. (2020). The Correlation Between Semantic And Phonology. Linguamedia Journal, 1(1)
  6. Ibrahim, M. A. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: alfabeta.
  7. Jehamin, Emilinda Oktaviani. 2019. Analysis of the Ineffectiveness of Using Sentences in the Thesis Abstract of Students of History Education Program Sanata Dharma University Graduated in 2017. Yogyakarta: Indonesia Language and Literature Education Study Program.
  8. Jufrizal. (2011) Introduction to Linguistics. In: Language and Linguistics. Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta, pp. 1-46.
  9. Karini, Z. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Sintaksis Pada Abstract Skripsi Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika STMIK AMIKOM Purwokerto. Probisnis, 9(2).
  10. Khikmah, L., & Kurniawan, E. Tantangan dalam Penulisan Artikel Abstrak Penelitihan untuk Publikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(2), 267-278.
  11. Kreidler, C. (2002). Introducing english semantics. Routledge.
  12. Lyons, J., & John, L. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Nafinuddin, S. (2020). Pengantar Semantik (pengertian, Hakikat, Dan Jenis).
  14. Nekah, S. M. A., Akhlaghi, E., & Ebrahimi, S. (2013). An assessment of lexical sense relations based on word association test. European Scientific Journal, 9(11).
  15. Puspita Febriasari, W. (2018). An Analysis Of Lexical Relations In Amnesia Song Taken From 5 Seconds Of Summer Album (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
  16. Pigott, J. (2006). The relationship between Word-association and learners’ lexical development. Published MA Thesis, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  17. Rohbiah, Tatu Siti. (2020). Introduction To Microlinguistics. Banten: Media Madani.
  18. Samodra, M. C., & Pratiwi, V. D. R. (2018, August). Lexical bundles in Indonesian and English undergraduate thesis abstracts. In The Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 166, pp. 193-191).
  19. Waris, A. M. (2012). Code-switching and mixing (Communication in Learning Language). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 13(1), 123-135.
  20. Winiharti, M. (2010). Sense Relations in Language Learning. Humaniora, 1(1), 100-106.
  21. Yusuf, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana.